Don’t invest unless you’re prepared to lose all the money you invest. This is a high-risk investment and you should not expect to be protected if something goes wrong. Take 2 minutes to learn more.

Three Numbers That Explain Why Tokenization Hit Escape Velocity

Crypto Market Monitor

The $24.7 billion sitting in on chain real-world assets represents something new in financial infrastructure: deployed capital that no longer distinguishes between “traditional” and “crypto” markets. It settles in minutes, trades 24/7, and increasingly functions as collateral in both worlds simultaneously.

It is not a narrative about future potential but a measurement of what has already been built. Three numbers explain why the infrastructure has reached escape velocity – and why the next phase of growth will look fundamentally different from the last.

Risk context:
Growth in tokenized real-world assets does not guarantee continued adoption, liquidity stability, or integration with traditional markets. Infrastructure development remains subject to regulatory, technological, counterparty, and market risks that may slow or reverse progress.

Number One: 42%

The concentration of the entire tokenized RWA market currently held in U.S. Treasury debt.

Figure 1: US Treasury Debt Instruments Dominate Tokenized Assets

 

Source: RWA.xyz (As on 12.02.2026)

Past performance is not indicative of future results.

 

More than two-fifths of all onchain real-world assets – $10.38 billion – sit in the boring, safest, most institutional instrument on earth. This constitutes BlackRock’s BUIDL fund ($2.17 billion), Circle’s USYC ($1.56 billion), which had overtaken BUIDL as the largest tokenized Treasury product in late January 2026. This also constitutes Ondo Dollar Yield Fund ($1.3 billion) and Franklin Templeton’s $800 million in Onchain US Govt. Money Fund, which is also integrated as exchange collateral.

This shift happened fast. Tokenized Treasuries crossed $10 billion in January 2026, up from under $1 billion in early 2024. This can be partly credited to the many improvements in regulatory clarity. For instance, the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) now explicitly recognizes tokenized money market funds as reserve assets for stablecoins and collateral for crypto transactions.

Figure 2: Tokenized US Treasury Debt Instruments Surpass $10 billion

 

Source: RWA.xyz (As on 12.01.2026)

Past performance is not indicative of future results.

 

But the mechanics matter more than the milestone. Circle’s USYC grew 11% in the past 30 days while BUIDL contracted 2.85%. The difference is not brand recognition – it is distribution architecture. USYC embedded itself into Binance’s collateral rails four months before BUIDL, capturing the flow of institutional derivatives margin. As JPMorgan framed it: tokenized Treasuries are not an alternative to stablecoins but an evolution of them – programmable cash equivalents that settle faster and integrate into collateral systems with less operational overhead.

Risk context:
Tokenized Treasury products remain subject to issuer, custody, liquidity, operational, and smart-contract risks. Regulatory treatment may evolve across jurisdictions, and tokenized instruments are not equivalent to direct ownership of underlying securities in all circumstances.

The yield is a modest 3.5% to 5% APY, and that is precisely the point. In a market where stablecoins yield near zero, tokenized Treasuries offer low-risk, government-backed yield exposure without exiting crypto rails. For corporate treasuries managing billions in working capital, that efficiency is not marginal. It is structural.

Risk context:

Yields on tokenized Treasury products are not guaranteed and may fluctuate with interest rates, market conditions, or fund structure. Investors remain exposed to price volatility, redemption constraints, and platform-level risk.

Number Two: 360%

The year-on-year growth of tokenized commodities.

This is the fastest-growing vertical in the entire RWA market. Tokenized commodities crossed $6.1 billion this week, adding $2 billion since January 1 alone. Gold trades at $5,080 per ounce, up 13% in January and 75% over the past year. But the on-chain version is moving faster than the physical metal.

Figure 3: Growth in Tokenized Commodities Moves In Tandem To The Underlying

 

Source: RWA.xyz (As on 12.02.2026)

Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Tether Gold (XAUt) now holds $2.7 billion in market cap, up 51.6% in the past month. Paxos Gold (PAXG) sits at $2.3 billion, up 133.2%, with $248 million in fresh inflows in January alone. Tether has accumulated an estimated 140 metric tons of physical bullion—turning the world’s largest stablecoin issuer into a sovereign-scale force in precious metals.

The dynamic is noteworthy: investors are treating tokenized gold as “Safe Haven 2.0.” Bitcoin has traded like a risk asset, down 10% over the past year. Gold has functioned as an uncorrelated store of value. Tokenization adds velocity to that stability—fractional ownership down to $0.01, instant settlement at 3:00 AM on a Sunday, direct redemption for physical bars at 430 tokens.

Risk context:
Tokenized commodities may not maintain historical correlation patterns. Market stress, liquidity constraints, custody arrangements, or issuer risk may cause tokenized assets to deviate from underlying physical prices.

James Harris, CEO of Tesseract Group, captured the shift: “The growing traction of tokenized gold has improved gold’s utility, particularly around transferability and divisibility, while bitcoin continues to trade more like a risk asset in periods of macro uncertainty.”

The 360% growth rate is an artifact of starting from a small base. But the $6.1 billion figure represents 83% of the entire tokenized commodities market, dominated by two products, backed by audited physical reserves, trading continuously across global exchanges.

Risk context:
Claims of physical backing depend on issuer transparency, audit integrity, custody arrangements, and legal enforceability. Token holders may face redemption, jurisdictional, or counterparty risk in adverse scenarios.

Figure 4: Gold Dominates Tokenized Commodities at 73%

Source: RWA.xyz

Past performance is not indicative of future results.

Number Three: 185%

The quarterly growth rate of tokenized Private Credit. (Yes, not annual but Quarterly!)

If Treasuries represent the foundation of institutional tokenization, Private Credit is emerging as its most dynamic vertical. This category was barely registered two years ago. Today it stands at $2.8 billion and is expanding faster than any other RWA segment.

Figure 5: Tokenized Private Credit Grows By 1248% in 1-Year

 

Source: RWA.xyz (As on 12.02.2026)

Past performance is not indicative of future results.

 

The growth is particularly notable because Private Credit was assumed to be resistant to tokenization. These are bespoke, illiquid, relationship-driven instruments, the type of assets that traditionally live in spreadsheets and legal documentation. Yet they are now growing at 185% per quarter while Corporate Bonds, supposedly the “easier” fixed-income opportunity, lag at $1.7 billion.

The mechanism is collateral mobility. Tokenization is not merely digitising Private Credit but is converting locked capital into programmable instruments that can move across platforms. Ondo Finance demonstrated this operational reality by tokenizing BitGo stock within 15 minutes of its trading debut. They are now running 200+ tokenized stocks and ETFs, scaling toward thousands.

Min Lin, Ondo’s managing director of global expansion, frames this as a deliberate design choice: “The wrapper model has been widely adopted. Stablecoins are essentially wrapped U.S. dollars and we have adopted a very similar model.”

The implication is clear. If stocks can be wrapped in 15 minutes and Private Credit can grow at 185% quarterly, the $127 trillion global equities market and $1.5 trillion Private Credit market are no longer theoretical targets. They are addressable markets with established technical pathways.

Risk context:
Tokenization of private credit and equities remains dependent on regulatory approval, legal enforceability, secondary liquidity, and investor demand. There is no assurance that large traditional markets will transition meaningfully to tokenized formats.

The Infrastructure Test

Early 2026 has delivered the first genuine stress test of this infrastructure. Market volatility exposed crypto’s sensitivity to sovereign bond markets and central bank transitions. Yet the $24.7 billion in tokenized RWAs did not unwind. Trading continued. Settlement remained instantaneous. BUIDL’s listing on Uniswap – BlackRock’s first DeFi integration proceeded without operational incident.

Risk context:
Short-term operational stability does not eliminate systemic risk. Tokenized markets remain exposed to liquidity shocks, smart-contract vulnerabilities, counterparty failures, and broader macroeconomic dislocation.

The divergence is what matters. Tokenization has reached a point where price action and structural progress no longer move in lockstep. The three numbers above – 42% concentration in Treasuries, 360% growth in commodities, 185 percent growth in private credit category describe a market that has crossed from experimental to operational.

Risk context:
Characterising tokenization as operational does not imply maturity or long-term durability. Market structure, regulatory frameworks, and institutional participation may evolve unpredictably.

The denominator remains vast. Global wealth exceeds $200 trillion. Tokenized RWAs represent 0.012% of that total. But the growth vectors are now clear: Treasuries as collateral infrastructure, commodities as velocity-enhanced safe havens, private credit as the persistent foundation that proved the model.

Risk context:
The scale of traditional financial markets does not guarantee proportional tokenization adoption. Structural, legal, technological, or macroeconomic factors may limit growth or impair asset valuations. Investors in tokenized products remain exposed to market risk and potential loss of capital.

This financial promotion has been approved by Zeyro LTD (FRN 1001386) on 13th Feb 2026.

Disclaimer – Research and Educational Content

This document has been prepared by AMINA Bank AG (“AMINA”). AMINA is a Swiss licensed bank and securities dealer with its head office and legal domicile in Switzerland. It is authorized and regulated by the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (“FINMA”). AMINA is not authorised or regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). UK regulatory protections do not apply.

This document is published solely for educational purposes; it is not an advertisement nor a solicitation or an offer to buy or sell any financial investment or to participate in any particular investment strategy. This document is for publication only on AMINA website, blog, and AMINA social media accounts as permitted by applicable law. It is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or would subject AMINA to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction.

Research will initiate, update and cease coverage solely at the discretion of AMINA. This document is based on various sources, incl. AMINA ones.  In preparing this document, AMINA may have made limited use of artificial intelligence–enabled tools to assist with research, summarisation, and drafting, with all content subject to human review and validation.

No representation or warranty, either express or implied, is provided in relation to the accuracy, completeness or reliability of the information contained in this document, except with respect to information concerning AMINA. The information is not intended to be a complete statement or summary of the subjects alluded to in the document, whereas general information, financial investments, markets or developments. AMINA does not undertake to update or keep current information. Any statements contained in this document attributed to a third party represent AMINA’s interpretation of the data, information and/or opinions provided by that third party either publicly or through a subscription service, and such use and interpretation have not been reviewed by the third party.

Any formulas, equations, or prices stated in this document are for informational or explanatory purposes only and do not represent valuations for individual investments. There is no representation that any transaction can or could have been affected at those formulas, equations, or prices, and any formula(s), equation(s), or price(s) do not necessarily reflect AMINA’s internal books and records or theoretical model-based valuations and may be based on certain assumptions. Different assumptions by AMINA or any other source may yield substantially different results.

Nothing in this document constitutes a representation that any investment strategy or investment is suitable or appropriate to an investor’s individual circumstances or otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation. Investments involve risks, and investors should exercise prudence and their own judgment in making their investment decisions. Financial investments described in the document may not be eligible for sale in all jurisdictions or to certain categories of investors. Certain services and products are subject to legal restrictions and cannot be offered on an unrestricted basis to certain investors. Recipients are therefore asked to consult the restrictions relating to investments, products or services for further information. Furthermore, recipients may consult their legal/tax advisors should they require any clarifications.

At any time, investment decisions (including, among others, deposit, buy, sell or hold investments) made by AMINA and its employees may differ from or be contrary to the opinions expressed in AMINA research publications.

This document may not be reproduced, or copies circulated without prior authority of AMINA. Unless otherwise agreed in writing, AMINA expressly prohibits the distribution and transfer of this document to third parties for any reason. AMINA accepts no liability whatsoever for any claims or lawsuits from any third parties arising from the use or distribution of this document.

©2026 AMINA, Kolinplatz 15, 6300 Zug

Share this article

Authors

Sonali Gupta

Senior Research Analyst AMINA India

Subscribe to AMINA Research

Subscribe to AMINA Research for our latest perspective.

More Research

  • 02.03.2026

    /

    Crypto Market Monitor

    Institutional Crypto Infrastructure: The Canton Context

    Institutional blockchain adoption has moved well beyond proof-of-concepts. Asset managers, banks, and infrastructure operators are actively deploying real-world asset tokenisation and cross-institution settlement workflows. But a critical gap persists: most enterprise-grade networks solve for privacy and compliance at the cost of interoperability, resulting in operational silos that limit their utility at scale.

    Read more
  • 27.02.2026

    /

    Crypto Market Monitor

    Beyond RWA Tokenization: Real-Time Settlement in Infrastructure Finance

    Financial systems have historically processed economic activity in batches. Certain tokenised systems enable elements of settlement and accounting to update with greater frequency.

    Read more
  • 17.02.2026

    /

    The Bridge

    The Current State of Staking: Institutional Adoption at Scale

    Institutional participation in staking reached a watershed moment in early 2026. Over $58 billion in capital now flows through liquid staking protocols, whilst an additional $19 billion has moved into restaking, according to DeFi Llama.

    Read more